"I had all these boxes of notes and papers in my office, and I was never going to publish every little observation.
Each main entry is followed by a reference to the hieroglyphic text in which the example can be found, while seven color figures illustrate a selection of these entries.Enter University of Texas archaeologist David Stuart, one of the world's leading experts in Maya script.
TANSAN ASPECT IN MAYA GLYPHS PORTABLE
The entries in the original and in this updated preliminary vocabulary have been elicited from hoeroglyphic texts (either carved, incised, or painted) on stone and wooden monuments (stelae, lintels, altars, etc.), on portable objects of stone, wood, bone, and shell, in murals, on cave walls, on ceramics, and in three of the four surviving screenfold books. The updated English-Classic Maya vocabulary contains over 530 entries.
The updated version of this preliminary vocabulary of hieroglyphic readings (still a precursor to a fully illustrated vocabulary) contains some 1,275 main entries, each defined with a minimum of one transcribed glyph example (in total there are over 2,500 transcription examples). During the period of June 2007-March 2009, the original vocabulary of 2002 was checked, revised, reduced, enlarged, and is now annotated in close to 300 cases. This is the updated preliminary Classic Maya-English, English-Classic Maya vocabulary. Figure 1: Roys' chart of the Glyph X variants, as reproduced by Kelley (1976: Fig. Roys' chart of the forms Glyph X1 to X6 was published by Wyllys Andrews (1934), who tried to show that each form of Glyph X accompanies two consecutive coefficients of Glyph C (Figure 1). The different forms of Glyph X were first compared and numbered by Lawrence Roys. A few years later, John Teeple noticed that the forms of Glyph X co-varied with the coefficient of Glyph C (1930). Morley was able to show that Glyph X follows Glyph C and precedes Glyph B, and that Glyph B never occurs without the presence of Glyph X.
TANSAN ASPECT IN MAYA GLYPHS SERIES
One of the most mysterious components of the Lunar series is Glyph X, whose existence and placement within the sequence was pointed out by Sylvanus Morley a hundred years ago (Morley 1916). Although the significance of many of its elements has been discovered thanks to hundred years of research, there are still significant lacks of understanding. The Lunar Series of Classic Maya hieroglyphic inscriptions still presents intriguing mysteries to the scholar. However, as the following sections attest, in spite of a variety of confounding factors and interpretive obstacles, there is a great deal that we can say about the linguistics of ancient Maya writing These are now the subject of considerable study, debate, and discussion. With the decipherment of the script in the 1980s and ’90s, specialists soon realized that many of the basic phonological, morphological, and syntactic features of this language are represented in great detail by the ancient writing system. Remarkably, virtually all of the extant hieroglyphic texts seem to represent a single “prestige” language that, even at the time of its use, may have been highly formalized and even archaic in some of its features (Macri and Ford 1997 Houston et al. These mostly record religious and historical information, although the styles and genres of such texts varied considerably over time and space. Thousands of ancient texts survive on stone monuments, various portable objects such as ceramics, and in three (possibly four) screen-fold books dating to the later stages of the script’s history. In this period the hieroglyphic script was used throughout the region we traditionally know as the “Lowland Maya area,” concentrated mostly in the lowlands of what is today Guatemala, Belize, southern Mexico (Yucatan, Campeche, Quintana Roo, Chiapas, and Tabasco) and parts of western Honduras. 300 B.C.) and lasting until the time of European conquest and domination. This essay provides an overview of the language attested in ancient Maya hieroglyphic writing, or what we choose to call Classic Mayan.1 The writing system was in use for nearly two thousand years, beginning in what archaeologists call the Late Preclassic period (ca.
0 kommentar(er)
